Exploring

New-Hire Buddy & Onboarding Matching

We're exploring automated onboarding-buddy pairing on the same engine that powers EventIntro's event matching. If you run a buddy program, tell us about it.

EventIntro's matching engine powers event and cohort networking today. We're exploring new-hire buddy matching as a next step — if this is your problem, tell us about it below and help shape what we build.

Who this is for

  • People teams pairing new hires with onboarding buddies by hand.
  • Companies whose buddy program quality swings wildly by who's assigned.
  • Anyone matching new starters to helpful peers from a spreadsheet.

The problem buddy programs keep hitting

Almost every company wants a new-hire buddy program, and almost every one assigns buddies by whoever's free that week. A good pairing makes a starter's first month; a mismatched one is a calendar invite both people ignore. The assignment is the whole program, and it's the part done with the least thought — which is exactly the kind of matching problem EventIntro's engine was built to solve.

Why a buddy match isn't an event match

An event introduction is symmetric and brief; a buddy relationship is lopsided and lasts weeks — the new hire mostly asks, the buddy mostly answers, until the starter finds their feet. Modeling that direction, the cadence of check-ins, and a sensible end date is what separates a real buddy feature from a one-off pairing, and it's what we'd want to learn from programs already running one.

Help decide whether we build it

This page exists to measure demand, not to sell a feature that isn't finished. If you run a buddy program, the most useful thing you can do is describe how you match today and where it falls down. Early input shapes the design and earns first access if we ship it.

Frequently asked questions

Does EventIntro run onboarding-buddy programs today?
Not as a packaged feature — which is why this page asks rather than sells. The matching engine that pairs people by need and offer is a clean fit for buddy assignment, and it runs in production for events. Whether to wrap it in onboarding-specific mechanics is what we're weighing.
How would buddy matching differ from event matching?
A buddy pairing is directional and durable — a new hire mostly needs, a buddy mostly gives, over weeks. Those differences (cadence, check-ins, a defined end) are exactly what we'd want to learn from a few real programs before building.
What happens if I share my program?
A person follows up to understand how you match buddies today and where it breaks. Early input shapes what we build and earns first access if we ship it.
Thanks — we've got it.
We read every one of these. We'll be in touch at the address you gave us.

Help shape this

We're exploring this. If it's your problem, tell us about it and help decide what we build.